学院非学院Ⅱ
赵力
上海艺博画廊成立于1998年,创办人是赵建平,至今已届10年,是上海地区乃至中国创办时间较早而呈规模化经营的画廊之一。从成立伊始上海艺博画廊的定位就毫不犹疑地偏重于中国当代艺术,这在当时仍趋于经典化的整体环境中尤其显得特别。在这一明确的定位之下,上海艺博画廊在21世纪初期举办过多次有影响的艺术家的联展和个展,对中国当代艺术的推广与收藏起到了积极的作用。
“学院与非学院”就是其中的一个有影响的中国当代艺术家的联展,展览时间在2001年5月。对展览学术性的重视,亦使得上海艺博画廊在国内较早就与艺术评论家、策展人一起建立起了画廊展览的策展机制。“学院与非学院”展邀请了著名艺术批评家栗宪庭进行策展并撰写评论文章,参展艺术家有王广义、王玉平、王岩、王易罡、方力钧、韦尔申、毛焰、刘小东、刘仁杰、许江、张晓刚、何多苓、陈钧德、罗中立、周春芽、俞晓夫、曾梵志等17位,基本囊括了当时的中国当代艺术的创作精英,亦成为一时的盛事。
2008年为了谋求更大的发展,上海艺博画廊决定迁至上海杨树浦路2361号,该地区是上海最新开发而在不久的未来将会发展为上海地区最重要的艺术创意产业集中区。画廊新的展览空间是在昔日工业仓库建筑的基础上通过艺术化的改造而形成的,其中的展览空间面积超过了600平方米,同时附设库房、办公、研究室等辅助性的空间。其改造项目设计则聘请当代艺术家艾未未来进行规划与创意,力图符合当下艺术创作的风貌与展览展示的新要求。
关于新空间的开幕展构想,也反映了上海艺博画廊对于自成立以来自我宗旨的那份坚持,即始终不移地关注和推动中国当代艺术的发展方向。经过与艺术家和策展人的反复商量,最终决定延续“学院与非学院”的展览标题,并推出了在此展题下的第二回展览。
作为上海艺博画廊新空间开幕展的“学院与非学院”第二回展览,坚持了首次展览针对中国当代艺术创作所进行的历时性梳理和现实性观察的策展理念,而在具体策划上则力图在兼顾两次展览间的“连续性”的同时,也形成所谓的“时间性的比照”,从而实现在展览中心内容上对中国当代艺术创作现状描绘的某种偏重。为此,“学院与非学院”第二回展览进而提出了在展览主标题之下的“时间性:差异时代与立场当下”的副标题,其目的就是希望通过这个展览立足于时间思考维向之上的深层探究,展现中国当代艺术创作背景的时代性变化,以及艺术家对此变化所做出的立场反应,以此期待引发更多的学术性思考。
“学院与非学院”第二回展览的参展艺术家有20位,他们是方力钧、何晋渭、李路明、李晖、李威、卢昊、毛焰、瞿广慈、隋建国、王光乐、王音、向京、叶永青、岳敏君、展望、张晓刚、曾梵志、周春芽、周铁海、左小祖咒。其中方力钧、毛焰、张晓刚、周春芽、曾梵志等5位,是曾经参加过2001年“学院与非学院”第一回展览的艺术家,而叶永青、周春芽、周铁海、卢昊、王音、李路明等,则既是在中国当代艺术发展中做出重要贡献,又在当下艺术创作中极为活跃的艺术家。本次展览也根据中国当代艺术的创作发展,在绘画的基础上大量增加了立体创作的展示部分,而隋建国、展望、向京、瞿广慈、左小祖咒等艺术家的参展,也为本次展览内容、空间展示方式的多样性增添了重重的砝码。此外,本次展览也试图关注到中国当代艺术发展的未来性,因此展览也邀请了像何晋渭、李晖、李威、王光乐这样的年轻艺术家参与,希望通过这几位有代表性的青年艺术家作品的参展,概括呈现年轻一代的艺术实践与艺术理想。
在参展作品的选择上,“学院与非学院”第二回展览以参展艺术家的新作以及新的艺术尝试为主体,采取了“近距离”的“取样方式”,从而使得整个展览在立足整体性概括的同时,也努力呈现出了艺术家丰富的个性。
方力钧的作品《2007.7.15》,反映了艺术家崭新的创作方向,他以寓言性的象征手法,在让人们观赏到画中人物优美姿态的同时,通过对充塞整个画面的无限增生、繁殖和克隆的昆虫形象的描写,既突出了其近期作品的幻觉化的特征,又基于这个特征而传达出艺术家对人类生存危机的强烈焦虑。曾梵志的《无题》,也是新近完成的作品,带有显明的“乱笔”的构成特征。但是与稍早的“乱笔”系列所不同的是,曾梵志的新作则带有了更强的自我控制力,这使得整个画面在充满了澎湃的激情表现力的同时,线条、色彩的统合性变得更加协调而强有力,从而形成了丰富而耐人寻味的动人情境。叶永青的艺术态度是极其明确的:以自我为中心,以超越为目的,这在其2008年创作的《画鸟》中表现得也十分明确。叶永青近期的创作,往往是以独行的鸟为画面的主体形象,它既是“一种自我经历的写照”,也是艺术家试图借助于当代艺术的“超越”诉求,“超越理智判断而得到更极致的结晶”的个人方式。毛焰一直以来都是一个艺术的完美主义者,他的绘画所坚持的不仅仅是语言的精微和技术的完备,更多的是对绘画本身意义的探询。他认为只有纯粹而趋于完美的绘画意义才是真正的完美,而关于这种意义的探询对于艺术家而言则是一件无穷尽的事情。毛焰的作品还体现了这种将无限的意义凝固在有限的范围内的独特能力,构成画面的超凡细腻和平静柔和。周铁海最广为人知的作品是“骆驼”系列,他把广告和西方名画等的主角人物“改装”成骆驼,其针对的是充满“中国符号”的当代艺术,具有某种“反讽”的作品特质。《亨利四世》也是这种个人方式的延续,而巨大的作品尺幅无疑将这一特质进一步放大,并构成了更为强烈的艺术针对性。卢昊的作品具有极其复杂的外貌,这与他从中国画跨界介入当代艺术的经历相关。《家园之二》,表面上与一些寻常意义上的街景画无异,但是这样的作品带有了更多的表现主义的特征。卢昊的作品有时候还呈现出某种明显的“破绽”,然而这些“破绽”并不是不完备的表征,而是艺术家的个人观念的有机反映:卢昊对北京四合院的主题关注,不仅仅是有关个人生活经历的记忆,更多的是基于历史的思考象限而对未来文化境遇的焦虑与不安。王音的《无题(月是故乡明)》,是艺术家“长腿女子”的新系列中的一幅。作品无疑带有很强的暗示性,而这些暗示性又与艺术家关于“对绘画艺术本身的直接呈现”纠缠在一起。因此王音的作品从表面上非常的简单明了,但是有关意义的释读往往又是艰涩的,而这些即构成了其作品不可偏废的“两翼”。李路明的《蒙古的妈妈》,来源于一张50年代的人物摄影,这似乎是一次明显的图像移用。李路明也引用了德国艺术家李希特图像的模糊处理的方式,但是他执著于黑白间的单纯,并将画面的不清晰导向了“有一种让我们着迷的气息和光晕”。因此,李路明从本质上离开了李希特式图像的“冷静与客观”,他的作品唤起的是个人的时代记忆以及围绕着这种唤起的那种心理悸动。
张晓刚的《失忆与记忆——男孩》、岳敏君的《生命中的色彩》与周春芽的《一公一母》,反映的是当下的中国当代艺术家对各种艺术媒材的介入,以及由此引发的创作变迁。张晓刚的《失忆与记忆——男孩》隶属于近期的艺术创作序列,然而是以大幅版画的方式完成的,张晓刚的版画并非是对绘画作品的无聊复制,而是带有更强烈的原作性的创作意图,巨大的尺幅既带来了强烈的视觉性,又不同于他的油画作品而具有手段上的实验性。岳敏君的《生命中的色彩》,体现的是平面绘画类型的艺术家关于空间化的谋求,事实是岳敏君在此之前已经创作出一些大型的雕塑作品,这些雕塑作品往往单体体积巨大,并通过集合式的排列而形成对空间的肆意侵占。《生命中的色彩》同样是对空间的肆意侵占,但是彼此之间的统合性更强,它打破了单体的塑造却构成了整体的视觉性,以及更夸张的体量。周春芽的《一公一母》,同样是艺术家在前期“绿狗”雕塑创作之上的发展。如果说“绿狗”的雕塑创作,是周春芽对其绘画形象的“模拟”的话,那么《一公一母》则已经脱离这种“模拟”而走向了独立,而周春芽利用不锈钢烤漆来进行的创作方式,则使他的雕塑语言显得更加娴熟完整。
展览对空间的讨论,或许更多地是落实在像隋建国、展望、向京、瞿广慈、左小祖咒等人的雕塑作品之中。隋建国的作品带有很强的观念性,他的个人思考也早已脱离开传统雕塑的范畴领域,他把自己的创作更多地视为个人性的实验意义,而他的批判立场既是针对历史的也是针对当下的,他的艺术解决方案也往往是在中国本土的知识谱系和文化脉络之中寻求最佳的答案与路径。展望对古代人造景观的再度创作并生成新的意义,是艺术家创作的核心,而“假山石”无疑是其最具代表性的作品系列。展望把“假山石”偷换成了不锈钢式的外貌,这并非仅仅是材质的变迁,在艺术家将“假山石”进一步“假化”的过程中,“正是离间学院方式及其现实主义原则、生活或历史本身、艺术家个人方式及其观念这三者之间精神关系的过程。”向京的《盛开》,是一件刻画极其精准的铜雕作品,所谓的精准,既是表达方式上的,也是精神层面上的。向京的创作还体现在艺术家立足于当下语境而做出的有关中国女性身体、女人与男人、女人与社会等关系的思考,或许有批评家认为向京的创作反映了女性主义或女权主义的诉求,然而从向京的作品而言,其观念及其相关呈现的手段则带有更多的普遍意义。瞿广慈的创作在近期出现了很大的变化,他开始在自己的创作中引入了大量历史性的视觉符号,并把这些视觉符号进行个人化的处理,这种处理的方式既包括了造型也包括了它的环境,其目的根本就不是所谓的“还原”,更多的则是“生成”,这给瞿广慈的创作带来了更大的自由发挥的空间。而左小祖咒的《1995—2007》,却与瞿广慈恰恰相反,其原型来自一张人们所耳熟能详的行为艺术的照片,它既是对这张作品图像的模拟,更是对其情境的历史还原。
王光乐、何晋渭、李威与李晖,是本次展览青年艺术家的代表,由他们所营造的视觉世界,敏感而激动地包容着现实世界的变化,同时也挑明了各自的态度、立场、趣味及其根源。于是越是走近他们,这种感受也会越强烈。王光乐的《水磨石200801》,是其最有代表性的创作,这些“水磨石子”,以近乎逼真的展现方式以及刻意夸耀的手工感,既对应于王光乐数月一幅的创作周期,形成了对其个人生命的时间性的记录、体验以及纪念的具体方式,同时也直接针对于观赏者,形成了某种基于空间之上的“时间性”的思考象限和心理暗示。何晋渭的《去处》是其最新系列中的一幅,他预见性地专注于下层群体的贫困、坚韧以及处于当下生活中的那份重压,并以近乎虔诚的姿态而孜孜不倦,反映出其强烈而独特的人文情怀。李威与李晖都关注于视觉性的结构,只是李威以平面的方式侧重于城市景观的营造,在表面是抽象的表达之中,营建的却是具像的景观,李晖则以空间为象限,炫技般地把三维性的物质实体投射为虚幻弥散,这是一种不可思议的“乾坤大挪移”,令我们在“虚”、“实”之间徘徊悱恻。
事实是以一个展览来描述中国当代艺术的现状显然是不可能的,然而上海艺博画廊仍然希望通过自己的努力,以及与当代艺术界的紧密合作,对中国当代艺术创作进行系列性的近距离的观察、展示与研究。这是上海艺博画廊对自己的期待,同样也是我们对上海艺博画廊的期待。
Academic and Un-academicⅡ
Text: Zhao Li
Yibo Gallery was established in 1998 by Zhao Jianping. It is one of the earliest commercial galleries in Shanghai. Since its beginning, the gallery has been focusing on Chinese contemporary art which was quite unique among the classical cultural aura around the city at that time. However, under this clear focus and mission, Yibo Gallery has held a series of influential exhibitions that actively develops the promotion and collection of Chinese contemporary art.
“Academic and Un-academic” is such an influential exhibition. It was held in May, 2001. Because of the academic focus, “Academic and Un-academic” established a curating system involved with critics, curators and the gallery. The gallery invited renowned critics Li Xianting to write the article for “Academic and Un-academic.” The exhibition attracted about 17 Chinese contemporary artists, including Wang Guangyi, Wang Yuping, Wang Yigang, Fang Lijun, Wei Ershen, Mao Yan, Liu Xiaodong, Liu Renjie, Xu Jiang, Zhang Xiaogang, He Duoling, Chen Junde, Luo Zhongli, Zhou Chunya, Yu Xiaofu, Zeng Fanzhi. As a result, this exhibition almost covered all the elites in the Chinese contemporary art community and became a big art event that year.
In 2008, Yibo Gallery decided to move to Yang Pu district for future expansion. The newly developed area is said to become one of the most important creative industry areas in the city. The new site was renovated from an old warehouse. The exhibition area exceeds 600 square-meter attached with warehouse, office and information room. The gallery also invited Ai Weiwei, a famous Chinese contemporary artist to design the new space, in hope that the venue would echo to the current artistic aura and meet the requirement of modern displaying mode.
The opening exhibition for this new space also reflects the continuing focus and mission of Yibo gallery since its opening: the promoting and supporting of Chinese contemporary art. Through repeated discussions with artists and curator, the gallery finally decided to follow its beginning theme of “Academic and Un-academic.”
The second-round “Academic and Un-academic” insists the original curatorial theme in historical link and realistic observation, and it also tries to consider the “continuity” between the first “Academic and Un-Academic” and second one. While at the same time, it forms a contrast in time difference. The contents of the exhibition stress on the current condition of Chinese contemporary art, thus the purpose of the sub-theme of “Time Difference: Different Eras and Existing Attitude” under “Academic and Un-academic” is to explore a deeper thinking, to express both the changes under different background of Chinese contemporary art and the artists’ responses towards these changes that may lead to more academic ponderings.
About 20 artists participates the second-round of “Academic and Un-academic,” including Fang Lijun, He Jinwei, Li Luming, Li Hui, Li Wei, Lu Hao, Mao Yan, Qu Guangci, Sui Jianguo, Wang Guangle, Wang Yin, Xiang Jing, Ye Yongqing, Yue Minjun, Zhan Wang, Zhang Xiaogang, Zeng Fanzhi, Zhou Chunya, Zhou Tiehai, Zuoxiao Zuzhou. Among them, Fang Lijun, Mao Yan, Zhang Xiaogang, Zhou Chunya and Zeng Fanzhi joined the first-round “Academic and Un-academic” in 2001. Ye Yongqing, Zhou Chunya, Zhou Tiehai, Lu Hao, Wang Yin, Li Luming not only makes their contributions to the development of Chinese contemporary art but also are active in their current creations. Due to the trend of Chinese contemporary art, this exhibition increases the part of three-dimensional art pieces. The display of the artworks by Sui Jianguo, Zhan Wang, Xiang Jing, Qu Guangci and Zuoxiao Zuzhou add variety to the contents and lay out of the exhibit. This exhibition is also keen on the future development of Chinese contemporary art, young artists including He Jinwei, Li Hui, Li Wei and Wang Guangle are invited. Their artworks summarize the artistic practice and pursuit of the younger generation.
The second-round “Academic and Un-academic” tries to select the latest artworks and new art from the participating artists, adopting the “sampling” and “zoom in” methods that not only presents a show but also reflects the variety of each artist.
Fang Lijun’s “2007.7.15” expresses his new direction in his creations. Through a symbolic method, the breeding and cloning insects are vividly crammed on canvas together with the elegantly posed human figure. The painting not only focuses an illusionary scenario but also renders the artist’s strong concern of the crisis facing the existence of humankind. The chaotic brushstrokes form a basic trait in Zeng Fanzhi’s latest “Untitled”. But different from his early “Chaotic Brushstroke” series, Zeng’s latest work has a strong self-controlled power. The blending of lines and hues become more powerful and harmonious while at the same time daunting passion is filled on canvas, which conjures up a touching and profound scene. Likewise Ye Yongqing has a clear attitude: self-centered and an attempt to surpass himself. This manifests clearly in his “Drawing Birds” created in 2008. His latest artwork mainly features the bird’s images. It mirrors the artist’s own experience, a desire to go far beyond, and a culmination beyond reasons. Mao Yan is always a perfectionist in art. He not only insists the intricacy in language or perfection in technique, but also explores the further meaning of painting itself. He thinks that only those pure and perfect paintings could convey the message of perfection, while the exploration in the meaning of painting itself is an endless task for artist. Mao’s artwork reflects his unique ability to freeze such indefinite meaning in a definite scope. His canvas is filled with tranquility, intricacy and softness. The “Camel” series is the most widely-known pieces for Zhou Tiehai. He “refits” the characters appearing in those advertisements or some Western masterpieces and makes them as his camel. It is quite ironic, aiming at the current contemporary art which is permeated with Chinese symbols. “Henry IV” continues such style. The overwhelming size of the piece further stresses this with a strong focus. On the surface, the artwork of Lu Hao appears quite complicated, which might involve with his experience of how he enters the Chinese contemporary art from the former painting area. “Homes No.2” featuring some ordinary street scene which is of no difference from other street scene paintings on the surface, yet the painting carries out more expressionistic meaning. Sometimes some “fractures” appears in Lu’s work, but they are not imperfect, instead the revealing of the artist’s personal thinking. Lu is concerned with the subject of the traditional residential buildings in Beijing, which is named “Siheyuan.” It is not only a recall of his life experience, but also his concern and worry of the future cultural environment through a historical angle. Wang Yin’s “Untitled” is one of the pieces of the artist’s “Girl with long legs” series. The work has a strong implication that mingled with the artist’s idea of “direct presentation of painting itself.” It is easy to decipher Wang’s work on the surface while actually it is not so easy to decipher the meaning behind. All these form the two “balanced wings” of the artist’s work. Li Luming’s “Mongolian Mother” comes from a portrait photo of the 1950s, which seems another obvious divert of the image. Li also refers to the blurred dealing of images by German artist Gerhard Richter. But Li is more addicted to the purity of the black and white hues, and the blurred image is filled with “some air or aura that makes us intoxicated.” Basically Li breaks away from Richter’s “sensible and objective” image. What his artworks evoke is a personal memory and a subtle psychological movement towards such memory.
Zhang Xiaogang’s “Amnesia and Memory – The Boy”, Yue Minjun’s “The color in life” and Zhou Chunya’s “One male and one female” reflect the “intruding” of all kinds of mediums applied by Chinese contemporary artists and the initiated changes . Zhang’s “Amnesia and Memory – The Boy” is one of his latest large scale prints. It’s not a boring copy from his canvas, but a piece with strong originality. Different from his canvas, this overwhelming size brings a strong visual effect with some experimental elements. Yue Minjun’s “The color in life” expresses a painter’s pursuit in space. In fact, the artist created a cluster of large-scale sculptures before. These sculptures, daunting in size, “recklessly invade’’ the space in groups. “The color in life” is also a reckless invasion of the space. They have close connections with each other that create a general visual effect through an exaggerated volume. Zhou Chunya’s “One male and one female” is also a further development of the artist’s early “Green Dog” sculptures. If “Green Dog” sculpture is an imitation of the images on his canvas, then “One male and one female” breaks away from such imitation. Zhou uses stainless steel and paint in his sculpture which makes his art language more skillful and complete.
The “discussion” on space at this exhibition is also reflected by the sculptures created by Sui Jianguo, Zhan Wang, Xiang Jing, Qu Guangci and Zuoxiao Zuzhou. Sui’s sculpture has a strong conceptual flavor. His personal thinking has broken away from the traditional sculpture area. He sees creations more as personal experiment. His critical position is not only aiming at history but also the current society. He seeks a best answer as an art solution among Chinese intellectual background and cultural system. The core in Zhan Wang’s art is the recreation of the ancient man-made landscapes with a new touch. Undoubtedly the “Artificial Rock” is the most representative work in his series. Zhan Wang transforms the surface of the “Artificial Rock” into stainless steel. It is not only a change in material, but also deepens the whole “artificial process.” It is a spiritual relationship between off-academic, the realism principal and life, or between history, the artist’s personal style and concept. Xiang Jing’s “Blooming” is a vividly and accurately depicted bronze sculpture piece. It is accurate not only in expression but also on a spiritual level. Her creations express her ponderings towards Chinese female body, the relationship between female and male, between female and society through a modern artistic language. Perhaps some critics may think that Xiang’s creations reflect her avocation in feminism. But her concept and lay out mode have more universal meaning. Qu Guangci’s latest artwork varies a lot from his previous ones. He applies many historical visual symbols into his pieces with a special treating including modeling and the relationship with the environment. His purpose is to generate rather than revert to its original shape, which gives the artist more freedom. While Zuoxiao Zuzhou’s art piece is totally different from Qu’s work, the photo comes from a shooting of one famous performing art piece. Zuo’s photo not only blurs the image of this picture, but also tries to “revert” to its historical scenario.
Wang Guangle, He Jinwei, Li Wei and Li Hui are the young representative artists at this exhibition. The visual world that they conjure up is sensitive and passionate, reflecting the vicissitudes of the realistic world. While at the same time, they manifest their own attitude, position, taste and origin. The more the viewer approach, the stronger the feeling is. Wang Guangle’s “Terrazzo 200801” is his most representative work. The vivid realistic displaying method and the purposely flaunted feel of hand labor match time that the artist consumes in his work: One month one piece. But it also records the time flow, his experience and memory in his personal life. While at the same time, his artwork evokes a psychological suggestion and the pondering on time. He Jinwei’s “Destination” is one of his latest pieces. He focuses on the poverty, persistence and the pressures of the people who are at the bottom level of the society. The artist piously and laboriously engages in his working that reflects a strong and unique humanistic care. Both Li Wei and Li Hui are interested in visual structure. Li Wei prefers to conjure up the urban landscape through a plane mode. On the surface, it may appear like an abstract expression, yet what he creates is a real concrete landscape. Li Hui has an incredible ability to project a realistic object radiated into an illusionary world, guiding the viewers to hesitate between reality and illusion.
Of course, it is impossible to describe the current condition of Chinese contemporary art merely through one exhibition. But Yibo gallery still believes that through its efforts and close collaboration with the contemporary art world, it is able to conduct a series of systematic zoom-in observation, displaying and studying of Chinese contemporary art. It is not only the expectation of Yibo Gallery, but also our sincere anticipation towards Yibo Gallery.